RICHARD CORNFORTH AUGUST 9th & 10th 2003 SEMINAR

Richard Cornfort Full Story

We are proud to offer for your continued education Richard Cornforth. Richard will be conducting an educational seminar and workshop to explain the process of voiding a judgment. He has been very successful in implementing these strategies for a number of years and has agreed to share this knowledge with those that wish to participate.

WHAT YOU WILL LEARN

Law of VOID JUDGMENTS

HOW TO VOID AN UNFAVORABLE COURT DECISION.

Richard Cornforth of Oklahoma City has re-vamped & restructured this Seminar using all new cases. Richard has a very impressive track record all around the country for assisting people in discovering and implementing the laws regarding Void Judgments. Most court judgments are void because of fundamental issues regarding lack of jurisdiction. Richard will show you the whys and hows of the LAW OF VOIDS and VOID JUDGMENTS, and more importantly, what You can do to implement them. Many judgments, both civil and criminal, are inherently void for want of law and subject-matter jurisdiction: Richard's successes are based on thoughtful understandings of why, and what the courts have to say on this subject.
This powerful Seminar presents straight-forward, no nonsense, workable legal actions, that will enable you to stop today's courts, with law advocacy from the perspective of winning,
[not whining about corrupt courts and a lack of justice in the system of "just-us."]

Lets roll up our sleeves, learn the law & do something about tyranny!

JOIN US IN THIS EXCITING - INTERACTIVE WORKSHOP

Name
Day Phone Number ( ) Best Time to Call
Second Family Member’s Name
Fax Phone Number ( )
Mailing Location
Citv/Town Postal Zone Code
State E-mail:
Number in Party Attending Single Second Family Member
Total $ Full Payment In advance Full Payment at the door
Hosea 4:6, “My people perish for lack of knowledge�

Entire civilizations have been lost due to lack of knowledge. America is no exception. Countless numbers of innocent Americans continue to lose their rights and never regain the God given rights we are entitled due to the lack of knowledge.
It’s time we take back control of our lives and property.


DATES August 9th and 10th, 2003
From 9:00AM – 5:00 PM +
LOCATION-
Economy Inn
Located at Exit 65 off I-20
1029 Briargate Circle
Columbia, S.C. 29210
Ph. # of Inn is (803) 772-0270

Inn is on Broad River Rd. on the North side of the Interstate, across from Appelbee’s. For best rate mention the J’Acusse Seminar being held there in the Audio Video Room. The Inn has assured me the electrical problems experienced last year have been taken care of. Several other motels are within 1/10 mile of the seminar. Several are listed below. Operative term is J’Acusse.

Price of admission to this event will be:
$100.00 in advance
$120.00 at the door
If you are part of an existing J’Acusse group meeting regularly deduct $10 and if you attended last year’s Cornforth seminar deduct $10. If your mate is going to attend their cost will be at a rate of one half of your cost.

*In order to keep the cost of this seminar as low as possible, we should receive full payment by Aug. 4th for those who wish to attend.
Please make your Reservations ASAP.

SEATING IS LIMITED TO 50 SO RESERVE YOUR SEAT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

REGISTRATION FORM
The S.C. J’Acusse Meeting Group
Richard Cornforth Seminar Aug. 9-10, 2003

SPECIAL NOTICE: ANY AND ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW WILL BE HELD IN THE STRICTEST CONFIDENCE AND NOT SHARED OR SOLD.

Questions and Phone Registration:
Roger Orme Davenport
(803) 532-2465

Register online E-Mail: ROD5222@netzero.net

Send United States Postal Money Orders to the Postal Location listed in the upper left hand corner. Leave blank the payee line.
ROD
Secondary motels close by
Ramada Limited rate of $44.95 King size bed, 49.95 for double.
Royal Inn has a rate of $35 single person, $40 double.
Best Inns is $52.95 double. (all the above are within 1/10 mile)
Best Inn is $49.95 for a double if multiple rooms are booked.
Best Western Inn is $65 double ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ .
Sheraton Hotel is $75 double ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ .
The above 3 Inns are located on Bush River Rd. (2 miles away)

Richard Cornforth

ADVERTISING BY MAGNA CARTA NEWS SERVICE

Driving directions to the Richard Cornforth Seminar

Montana Prosecutorial Misconduct

A study of criminal appeals from 1970 to the present revealed 69 Montana cases in which the defendant alleged prosecutorial error or misconduct. In eight, judges ruled a prosecutor’s conduct prejudiced the defendant and reversed or remanded the conviction, sentence or indictment. In four, a dissenting judge or judges thought the prosecutor’s conduct prejudiced the defendant.

Two of the reversals involved prosecutors withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense, and six involved improper trial arguments. Among the four cases with dissenting judges, two involved prosecutors arguing facts that were not in evidence.

In 2000, the state Supreme Court reversed Michael Stewart’s conviction for altering a prescription because Missoula prosecutor Robert Zimmerman withheld evidence from the defense. Zimmerman did not disclose the evidence to the defense before he introduced it at trial, then he mentioned it twelve times in his closing argument. The court pointed to four other points in Zimmerman’s trial arguments that were improper.

In 1995, the state Supreme Court vacated the death sentence of Lester Kills on Top because Custer County prosecutors withheld evidence from the defense. The court ruled that there was a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the jury might have given Kills on Top a lighter sentence.

In 1995, the state Supreme Court reversed Stuart Stringer’s conviction for aggravated kidnapping and assault on his former wife because former Cascade County Attorney Patrick Paul made several improper comments at trial.

Paul told the jury that judges had approved an indictment and ensured that there was probable cause before he could even bring the case to trial.

The court held this argument prejudiced Stringer because it implied that his defense counsel was hiding evidence of his guilt and the judge thought he was guilty.

Paul said he told the jury about the judge approving the indictment in response to defense counsel’s closing argument, in which he told the jury the only reason Stringer was on trial was because Paul had a vendetta against him.

“In the normal course of things, it would be prosecutorial misconduct and probably grounds for a mistrial,” Paul said. “But in this case, I had to respond and say we’re here because there was probable cause to file the case.”

The court also ruled it was improper for Paul to say Stringer’s wife was “willing to lie” on the stand. “The prosecutor commented so directly on the credibility of the witnesses, and called them liars in so blunt a manner that we cannot conclude that he was merely commenting on or pointing up inconsistencies in the testimony,” wrote Justice James Nelson.

Paul said he does not remember using the word “lie” in his arguments, but he said it wouldn’t have been improper if he did.

“I have a pretty strong opinion on that one,” he said. “If they’re lying, they’re lying—I don’t agree that you can’t call witnesses liars; that’s just beating around the bush.”

After the court reversed Stringer’s conviction, he pleaded guilty to a lesser charge for a lesser sentence.

Paul worked as county attorney until 1995, when he unsuccessfully ran for district court judge. He is now in private practice, but he said the prosecutor in him has not disappeared.

“I still have some of a prosecutor’s mindset,” he said. “You’re guilty until proven innocent—I say that tongue in cheek, but that’s the way they approach things.”  ¶ 1:34 PM